Saturday, February 7, 2009

Losing my faith

I have a bizarre collection of favorite sports teams. The logical reason for this is that I have never lived in a major sports city, the actual reason for it is that I wanted to root for teams that no one else I knew rooted for. I'm not sure how I settled on the Minnesota Vikings as my favorite football team, I just remember them playing the defending champion Redskins in a playoff game and wanted to see the champs go down. Plus I needed a token black friend, and Dennis Green seemed just as good a choice as anybody. It took me awhile to pick a baseball team cause I never played the game as a kid, but I moved to the Pacific Northwest in 95 during the Mariners breakout season and kind of got caught up in the excitement. But my favorite sport has always been basketball, and my favorite sports team has always been the Phoenix Suns.

My love affair with the Suns stared in the 92-93 season, the first year of the Charles Barkley era. The Chicago Bulls had won the last two championships, and worse, every one of my childhood friends loved them. I LOATHED them. And when the Suns got out to a hot start that season, I jumped on the bandwagon, hoping they could end the freaking Bulls dynasty and shut all my snot nosed friends up. I probably cared about the 93 NBA Finals more than anything else in my entire life.

However, it wasn't to be. And despite the fact that Jordan decided to play with much smaller balls the next year, the Suns never did win a championship with Barkley, or even make the Finals again. The team had a history of losing the big games, and Barkleys "unusual" physique began to break down. After the 96 season, when the team went 41-41, the Suns decided to get rid of their biggest star and start over. It would be awhile before they became relevant again.

Well, it seems that history is repeating itself. Its impossible to not see the similarites between Barkley's four years in Phoenix and their last four years with Steve Nash. The team was always good, but never great. And with age and other teams catching up to the team, it appears that another big shakeup is in the works. Their one elite player, Amare Stoudemire, can be had for any reasonable package. Their newest acquistion, Jason Richardson, can be had for even less. (Never mind that the Suns shipped out a good young player in Boris Diaw and a reliable veteran in Raja Bell for him just a couple months ago). And their legendary player, Shaquille O'Neal, can be had for a case of hot pockets.

This all just makes me sick to my stomach. My all time favorite sports team was the 05-06 Suns, when Steve Nash led the team to the Western Conference Finals despite losing Amare for the season due to injury. They were probably the best team in 06-07, but had to deal with a ref who was CONVICTED OF FIXING THE FREAKING GAME in Game 2 of the Western Conference Finals against the Spurs. Then Amare and Diaw were suspended for Game 6 of the series when they objected to Robert Horry tackling Nash at the end of Game 5, and they lost the series in 7. No seriously, I'm completely over it.

Of course, the next year they decided to trade for Shaq. Because when you have the fastest team in the NBA, and you have an opportunity to add the slowest player in the NBA, you have to do it. It was a dumb trade, everyone killed them for it, but they weren't going to win the championship anyway. The seven seconds or less era was over. And now it appears its fire sale time for the Suns. I understand why they are doing it cause they are old and not getting any younger, but its depressing none the less.

Anyway, I hope they trade Amare to the Cavaliers for Wally Szckzmkqcpvibak and other used parts, just to make sure that the Lakers or Celtics don't win it. Its practically giving him away, but I don't have the heart to watch them lose

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

How you should bet on the Academy Awards

I kind of have a weird thing for the Academy Awards. Not the "What is Scarlett Johannsen wearing?" part of it, I just like to know what people generally consider are the best movies of the year. I try to make it a point to watch the five movies nominated for Best Picture every year, though it seems I only go 4 for 5 most of the time. Anyway, since sportsbook.com lets you wager on which of the nominees you think will win the major categories, I thought I would share my opinion. These are just my guesses though, don't come crying to me when all of these picks go horribly wrong.

Best Picture:
Slumdog Millionaire - 1 to 3
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button - 3 to 1
Milk - 5 to 1
Frost/Nixon - 10 to 1
The Reader - 12 to 1

I was under the impression that this was basically a toss up between Millionaire and Benjamin Button. Oddsmakers see it differently, they have Millionaire 9 times more likely to win than Benjamin Button. 9 TIMES!!! I just hate those odds for Millionaire. I liked it and all, but it felt like a less interesting version of City of God to me, which didn't even get a freaking nomination. Benjamin Button was merely a good movie, but, for lack of better words, it just felt like an Academy Award kind of movie. Put your money on Benjamin Button.

By the way, I have heard several suggestions on who the real life Benjamin Button is, the most common one being Greg Oden. I just wanted to throw a suggestion out there as well for someone aging in reverse, Ruby Dee. If you saw the mini-series The Stand ten years ago, she played someone well past the century mark in years, her face looked like a bowl of pudding that had been left out in the sun for three days. Obviously she didn't look YOUNG in American Gangster, but she looked younger. Like she could actually be Denzel Washington's mom, as opposed to The Stand, where she looked like she could be Booker T. Washington's mom. If she's playing Beyonce Knowles somewhat MILFy mom in the straight to DVD movie Glitter 2 five years from now, we will definitely know something is up.

Best Actor:
Mickey Rourke (The Wrestler) - 2 to 3
Sean Penn (Milk) - Even
Frank Langella (Frost/Nixon) - 7 to 1
Brad Pitt (The Curious Case of Benjamin Button) - 10 to 1
Richard Jenkins (The Visitor) - 12 to 1

All you need to know about Jenkins chance of winning is that sportsbook.com currently has him nominated for the wrong movie. It says Richard Jenkins (The Reader). How he is only 12 to 1 is beyond me, I wouldn't wager on him at 100 to 1. As for the actual contenders, I liked Rourke in The Wrestler, and he certainly seems to be the sentimental favorite. Penn is always good, he's come along way from Jeff Spicoli. (Seriously though, what are the odds that Spicoli would become one of the most respected actors in Hollywood? Can you imagine traveling 20 years into the future and Sean William Scott is being nominated for an Oscar every other year? I'm not even sure Stifler's Mom would believe that.) But the bet I love is Langella at 7 to 1. You could definitely see momentum for him building as the Oscars get closer. He may be my favorite bet on the board.

Best Actress:
Kate Winslet (The Reader) - 3 to 5
Anne Hathaway (Rachel Getting Married) - 8 to 5
Meryl Streep (Doubt) - 7 to 2
Angelina Jolie (Changeling) - 10 to 1
Melissa Leo (Frozen River) -10 to 1

If you feel like taking one of the longshots go with Leo, she would have a reasonable shot if anyone had actually seen Frozen River. In reality, its a three way race between Winslet, Hathaway and Streep. I'm rooting hard for Winslet since she gets naked early and often in The Reader; I always hoped being a sex addict would be the actress equivalent of "going retard" to get an Academy Award. You hear me Keira Knightley? You go all the way with that lesbian scene in The Duchess, and not only do you have a nomination, but you also sell about a million more DVD's to awkward teenage boys. Its a win-win. ANYWAY, since this award seems pretty wide open, Streep getting 7 to 2 seems to be the way to go. Let's hope it doesn't happen though, no one wants to see a pious nun trend start up in Hollywood.

Best Supporting Actor:
Heath Ledger (The Dark Knight) - 1 to 20
Josh Brolin (Milk) - 14 to 1
Phillip Seymour-Hoffman (Doubt) - 14 to 1
Michael Shannon (Revolutionary Road) - 15 to 1
Robert Downey Jr. (Tropic Thunder) - 25 to 1

I guess this is the best place for me to go on a rant about The Dark Knight. And the thing is this: Ten years from now, the one movie that 2008 will be remembered for is The Dark Knight. Whether it was the best movie of 2008 is debatable, whether it was the most significant movie of 2008 is undeniable. I figured it was a lock for the last nomination, the Academy usually goes with one oddball nomination like Juno or Sideways. Instead this year they nominated 5 dramas. Its like the BCS in college football, no matter how good a MWC team or an action movie is, it's not going to win the biggest prize. I'm not saying that The Dark Knight SHOULD win Best Picture or Utah SHOULD win the National Championship, but they should be given the chance.

As for the odds, Heath Ledger is the biggest favorite out of any category at 1 to 20. For those of you that don't know, that means if you bet 100 dollars on Ledger winning and you were right, you would win 5 dollars total. Not exactly a money maker. If you insist on betting on someone else, bet on the next 3 actors; Brolin, Hoffman and Shannon. If an upset happens (And it almost certainly won't) you are going to win a decent amount. Save your money betting on Downey Jr. though, how he finagled an Oscar nomination for portraying an Oscar winning actor is beyond me. Overall though, my reccomendation is to avoid this category

Best Supporting Actress:
Penelope Cruz (Vicky Christina Barcelona) - 4 to 7
Viola Davis (Doubt) - 11 to 4
Marisa Tomei (The Wrestler) - 7 to 2
Taraji P Henson (The Curious Case of Benjamin Button) - 8 to 1
Amy Adams (Doubt) - 12 to 1

Since I have yet to see Doubt or Vicky Christina Barcelona, it would be unfair for me to evaluate this category. However, since this is my blog and no one cares, I'm going to do it anyway. Davis apparently was fantastic in Doubt, but didn't have much screen time. It will be a cold day in hell before Tomei wins a second academy award, though much like Winslet, she spent a good deal of The Wrestler without the benefit of clothes. So she is my sentimental favorite. But the only real bet here is Cruz. I think she's got a better chance than Slumdog Millionaire for Best Picture, but you can get better odds on Cruz. But I would probably want to actually see the movie before I put my cold, unearned cash on her.

Best Director:
Danny Boyle (Slumdog Millionaire) - 1 to 6
David Fincher (The Curious Case of Benjamin Button) - 4 to 1
Gus Van Sant (Milk) - 10 to 1
Ron Howard (Frost/Nixon) - 10 to 1
Stephen Daldry (The Reader) - 15 to 1

I don't like any of these bets really. Boyle is the second biggest favorite on the board after Ledger for Supporting Actor, but I'm not betting 600 dollars on him for a chance to win 100. I guess Fincher is the best play at 4 to 1, and if you can parlay that with Benjamin Button for Best Picture you could make some good money. Still though, I'm avoiding this one like the plague. Maybe if I could get 1000 to 1 on Christopher Nolan I would take that, it has to be a mistake that he didn't make the cut


Sorry folks, thats all the categories to bet on. Screenplays get no sportsbook love apparently. Just to be clear, these aren't my actual picks for the Oscars, just the odds that I like best. My top three overall would be Langella for Best Actor at 7 to 1, Streep for Best Actress at 7 to 2, and the Curious Case of Benjamin Button for Best Picture at 3 to 1. Mark it down now, one of those three will be correct.

Tiiiiiimmmmeee...is on my side

Well like many people in America these days, I have recently lost my job due to the slumping economy. While this may seem like a big deal to some, considering my job paid a whopping 13.00 an hour (And was the highest paying job I have ever held) , I look at my unemployment as a golden opportunity. An opportunity to gamble for staggeringly low stakes online in poker, blackjack, and sports; I already have my ticket to a 2000 dollar freeroll on pokerstars.com for Saturday. I have had the opportunity to watch movies I never really wanted to watch that much in the first place, many of which have failed to meet my already lukewarm expectations. I have been able to watch more college basketball than I ever have before, to the point where I am taking notes on games with a highlighter that matches the color of my t-shirt. In short, I have more free time then I know what to do with.
So with all this free time I decided to create a blog. This will be my opportunity to complain about all the things I love (sports, movies, gambling) and ignore all the things I hate (music, politics, the Snuggie). Since no one is ever going to read this, I can say whatever I want. And if any of you nonexistant readers want to comment or anything, feel free. Your fictional opinions are appreciated.